A family court judge has criticized the lack of service on an adoption application upon finding a birth mother. The Judge suggested Facebook as one solution for reaching out to parties.

The Honorable Mr Justice Holman said it was ‘deeply regrettable’ that a final adoption application hearing had proceeded without the mother even knowing it was happening.

In one instance a child aged four was placed in the care of Manchester City Council. The parents were both party to proceedings but appeared to play only a relatively limited part in the proceedings. The child was then placed for adoption and has lived with the adoptive family for 10 months. The birth father sought leave to oppose the making of an adoption order, which was granted and a date set for a final hearing into the adoption application.

During that final hearing, it emerged there was concern about the whereabouts of the birth mother and the service of proceedings upon her. She had left the UK in early 2016 and since December, Holman said no further attention seemed to have been given by any party to the notice of proceedings.

The judge said it was ‘very depressing’ that despite statutory and rule changes, the difficulty of service upon birth parents remained as they were when he began in practice 45 years ago.


During the hearing, it was discovered the birth father’s new partner had held a telephone conversation with the birth mother after she had been tracked down through a Facebook search.

She did not have the ‘slightest idea’ of the current existence of the adoption proceedings and mistakenly thought her son had been adopted long ago.

The local authority and the child’s guardian were sceptical that the mother could have been found through a Facebook search. But the judge said that if it was true they could have easily established a line of communication.

Representative’s on behalf of the children’s guardian, indicated that CAFCASS guardians were forbidden from making any attempt to communicate with people through Facebook. It was later conceded there was no such rule.

Holman said he wanted the judgment to highlight that social media may be a useful tool for tracing parents. Particularly parents who are being served with a notice of adoption.

It does seem to be a useful tool in the armory which can certainly be resorted to long before a conclusion is reached that it is impossible to locate the whereabouts of a birth parent,’ he said. ‘Of course, not everyone is on Facebook. But in this particular case, a relatively socially disadvantaged young mother has been found very rapidly by that means.”

We can help

If you wish to discuss this or any other matter please contact a member of the family team. We have offices in Lincoln, Boston, Grantham, Newark, Sleaford and Spalding or call Jess on 01205 311511.

How can we help?

    Contact Details
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Google Privacy Policy, Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.